Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Descender horizontal offset mismatch for curly and non-curly variants #1521

Closed
pv4 opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Descender horizontal offset mismatch for curly and non-curly variants #1521

pv4 opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@pv4
Copy link

pv4 commented Jan 10, 2023

Non-curly U+049B, U+049a, U+2C69 variants have descenders with larger horizontal shift to the right than the curly variants, thus making the descenders of non-curly variants distinguished better, than of curly ones.

U+049B.cv61=13 (non-curly)
image
U+049B.cv61=14 (curly)
image

I can't believe this is intentional. If you decide to fix curly variants by increasing descender's shift to the right, then could you please consider NOT closing this issue ASAP and altering other glyphs (all necessary variants) as well? Expecially U+0496, U+0497 and probably their non-slab/italic/italic-non-slab variants (but, I know, these are already too wide by themselves, so... use your taste).

image
image
image
image
image

@pv4 pv4 added the 🐞 Bug label Jan 10, 2023
@be5invis
Copy link
Owner

Attached descenders' rightmost position should align to the position of corresponded serifs. May need fixing K and Zhe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants