You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(Only boundaries for GP changed in the 2 plots)
Do you have any hints how a change in the boundaries effect exploration that much?
Our understanding was, that boundaries shouldn't effect exploration at all but only act as a limit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It shouldn't all inputs being equal (the code is deterministic). There are
three main sources for behavior change that come to mind:
- Random observation noise can affect exploration.
- If you do hyperparameter optimization that can affect exploration
- If you're discretizing the space, the behavior can change depending on
the discretization. This could be implicit: e.g., if you have 100 points
per dimension, then changing the domain affects the discretization.
We have random noise, but it is sampled from a seeded distribution.
Hence, we have a deterministic behavior, i.e. with the same bounds we can reproduce each of the above shown plots exactly.
(Only boundaries for GP changed in the 2 plots)
Do you have any hints how a change in the boundaries effect exploration that much?
Our understanding was, that boundaries shouldn't effect exploration at all but only act as a limit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: