New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BCP47 lang tag to OT langtag mapping: zh-MO and zh-Hant-HK are mapped to ZHT #300
Comments
cc @brawer |
@kenlunde, do you agree that it's better to map zh-MO (and zh-Hant-Mo) to ZHH instead of ZHT? |
Fixed 'zh-Hant-HK'; waiting for confirmation from Ken re MO. |
@jungshik: Yes, the most appropriate mapping for zh-MO (and friends) would be to ZHH rather than ZHT. |
behdad
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2016
Thanks. All fixed. |
🍻 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Test page: http://jungshik.github.io/noto/locltest/locl-test.html
The last three segments in red should all have 'HK' and identical. They're lang-tagged with 'zh-HK', 'zh-Hant-HK' and 'zh-MO'. However, the latter two are mapped to 'ZHT' instead of 'ZHH' ('TW' is shown in place of 'HK' in both Chrome and Firefox).
The heuristics in hb-ot-tag.cc needs a bit of adjustment.
The test font comes from https://github.com/adobe-fonts/locl-test and locl-test.htmll is slightly modified to include zh-Hant-HK and zh-MO.
/cc @kenlunde
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: