Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 13, 2018. It is now read-only.

deps: possibility to declare dependence without explicit including item #459

Closed
dfilatov opened this issue Sep 16, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

deps: possibility to declare dependence without explicit including item #459

dfilatov opened this issue Sep 16, 2013 · 0 comments
Labels
wontfix

Comments

@dfilatov
Copy link
Contributor

Now when we have declarations b1 mustDeps b2 we explicit include b2 to build. We need to have possibility to declare same dependence but b2 should be included only if really needs.
This was referenced Sep 18, 2013
Merged
Merged
@ghost ghost assigned veged Sep 19, 2013
veged added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2013
@veged
close #459: deps: possibility to declare dependence without explicit …
cc51b60 
…including item
arikon referenced this issue Oct 16, 2013
@arikon
Merge pull request #463 from bem/issues/459@support/0.6.x
be7ff3f 
deps: possibility to declare dependence without explicit including item
veged added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2013
@veged @arikon
close #459: deps: possibility to declare dependence without explicit …
fc2ab72 
…including item

Conflicts:
	lib/techs/deps.js.js
arikon referenced this issue Oct 16, 2013
@arikon
Merge pull request #464 from bem/issues/459@release-1.0.0
901e92a 
deps: possibility to declare dependence without explicit including item
@vithar vithar unassigned veged Oct 2, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
wontfix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@veged @dfilatov @tadatuta