Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cross-env to version 3.1.2 πŸš€ #16

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

cross-env just published its new version 3.1.2.

State Update πŸš€
Dependency cross-env
New version 3.1.2
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of cross-env.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

3.1.2 (2016-10-08)

Bug Fixes

  • kill: Add all kill signals - Adds the 4 main kill signals that NodeJS handles - Add te (5d932c93)

The new version differs by 7 commits .

  • 5d932c9 fix(kill): Add all kill signals
  • e847b18 fix(build): build all of src
  • 8da54d0 feat(vars): Convert environment vars (#32)
  • f2275d5 fix(deps): Swap lodash.assign for Object.assign. (#29)
  • 9976b5e fix(defaults): macOS env.APPDATA should be undefined (#27)
  • b7f6245 chore(ci): Run tests against same node versions (#26)
  • 1582ac1 Add Related Projects section to README (#22)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚑ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 8, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 79085027544ca79924b2dd2730be55cfc0d15369 on greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 into 3b73854 on master.

@ben-eb ben-eb force-pushed the greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 branch from 7908502 to efeff3e Compare October 14, 2016 18:52
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 14, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling efeff3e28093228afc9d431c900883b47d558363 on greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 into a7e1974 on master.

@ben-eb ben-eb force-pushed the greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 branch from efeff3e to 4c48220 Compare November 1, 2016 18:22
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 4c48220d3071ddac1b75ee774047e98b164a547a on greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 into 8f69ff6 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 4c48220d3071ddac1b75ee774047e98b164a547a on greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 into 8f69ff6 on master.

@ben-eb ben-eb force-pushed the greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 branch 2 times, most recently from 76bfdad to e6a313b Compare November 24, 2016 16:07
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 24, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 76bfdad35c7f7b477963886e4d3ce45e2feed9f0 on greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 into 386f091 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 24, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e6a313b on greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 into 79585aa on master.

@ben-eb ben-eb closed this Apr 27, 2017
@ben-eb ben-eb deleted the greenkeeper-cross-env-3.1.2 branch April 27, 2017 19:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants