fix: importing mlflow:/ urls with no extra path info #2930
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR address?
When importing a MLFlow model with a models:/ URI, the downloader puts the files at the registered model path directly into the
dst_path
. Whendst_path
is specified asbento_model.path
in this case, the downloader simply returns that same value. Ifbentoml_model.path
had the value/tmp/test_tmp_path
, then the subsequent rename of the downloaded dir tomlflow_model
to turn into the equivalent of:shutil.move(/tmp/test_tmp_path, /tmp/test_tmp_path/mlflow_model)
, which is going to always fail. The other URI types I've tried don't seem to do this, they all seem to create a subdirectory underbento_model.path
as a side effect of the download.This fix creates an extra directory to download into, so if a
models:/
URI is used, it will instead download into this directory and give theshutil.move
something to rename. If the directory is still there after the fact, it's cleaned up.Before submitting:
guide on how to create a pull request.
make format
andmake lint
script have passed (instructions)?those accordingly? Here are documentation guidelines and tips on writting docs.
Who can help review?
Feel free to tag members/contributors who can help review your PR.