docs: updates on blocks that failed to render #3031
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aarnphm
changed the title
|
@aarnphm do we have a guideline for when to use |
|
I think it is a syntactic choice. double backtick feels more natural to markdown for inline. |
Signed-off-by: Aaron Pham <29749331+aarnphm@users.noreply.github.com>
aarnphm
force-pushed
the
docs/bento-format
branch
from
5befeae
to
5e34b95
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are some docs block that are not render
also start migrating :code: to double backtick for inline