Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add watermark support #25

Closed
ribtoks opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #26
Closed

Add watermark support #25

ribtoks opened this issue Sep 16, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #26
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ribtoks
Copy link

ribtoks commented Sep 16, 2023

Thank you for developing Gallery Deluxe! (it was the only gallery that "just worked" for me).

Would be great if during/after generation, gallery supported applying a .png watermark on top of images.

Why it has to be done on the gallery level and not at originals level is that tiny previews should not have a watermark, while when user clicks to see the larger picture - it should have one.

@bep bep changed the title [Feature request] Watermark support Add watermark support Sep 19, 2023
@bep bep added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 19, 2023
@bep
Copy link
Owner

bep commented Sep 19, 2023

Yea, that sounds like a good idea.

bep added a commit to bep/gallerydeluxe_starter that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2023
bep added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2023
bep added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2023
@bep bep closed this as completed in #26 Sep 20, 2023
bep added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2023
@ribtoks
Copy link
Author

ribtoks commented Sep 21, 2023

Wow, I couldn't imagine that it can be added so fast. Thank you! Already migrated from my bash script with composite from ImageMagick and it works!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants