Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Semantic annotation for bounding boxes? #13

Closed
neyrinck opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Semantic annotation for bounding boxes? #13

neyrinck opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@neyrinck
Copy link

Hi, great dataset! I was wondering if the object semantic annotations, currently only in semantic.png files it seems, could somehow be inferred from the 3D bounding box id's in bbox_3d.json, or in any other 3D data? If not, could this easily be added? Thank you!!!

@bertjiazheng bertjiazheng added the question Further information is requested label Apr 24, 2020
@bertjiazheng
Copy link
Owner

Hi, @neyrinck

Currently, the semantic annotations only saved in the semantic.png. You can get infer the semantic label for the 3D bounding box from semantic.png and instance.png in the perspective images.

Best,
Jia

@neyrinck
Copy link
Author

neyrinck commented Apr 24, 2020

Thanks! And (it seems) from the panoramic images, too, which is easier!

@bertjiazheng
Copy link
Owner

The current version of the dataset does not include instance.png for the panoramic images, but we are currently working on it. Hope this helps.

@neyrinck
Copy link
Author

neyrinck commented Apr 24, 2020 via email

@bertjiazheng
Copy link
Owner

You could get an accurate label for each 3D bounding box with the instance label. Without instance label, the semantic label can be determined by the majority voting within each bounding box.

@Xia0ben
Copy link

Xia0ben commented Aug 26, 2020

Hi @bertjiazheng !

Great dataset indeed ! I ended up finding the same issue when exploring the data : having semantic labels directly associated with the 3D bounding boxes would be so much more helpful ! Especially since it would likely be more accurate to do the association from the source data you used for producing the dataset than inferring it from panoramic pictures (that may hide much of the information because of object occlusion).

As far as you know, has any user tried to do this completely ? @neyrinck, @micaeltchapmi, did any of you succeed in computing this inference ?

Could you please consider providing these annotations ? This would really help in working with the dataset, and would not require any new information in itself.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants