Remove references to specific projects from the readme #10836
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
B-Reif
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2023
alice-i-cecile
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2023
alice-i-cecile
added
C-Docs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bevy builds on a ton of different libraries. Choosing who gets "prime real estate" in the readme is hard / political. Closing that can of worms makes a lot of sense to me.
I have also removed the "alternatives" section for similar reasons. There are a number of engines/libs that aren't credited there, some of those listed no longer exist / aren't maintained, and it isn't really our job to be the canonical source. Each alternative listed is a soft endorsement of the project (and the reverse is true for projects we don't include). Again, closing this can of worms feels like the right call.