Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added ip forwarding flag #115

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 12, 2014
Merged

added ip forwarding flag #115

merged 4 commits into from Apr 12, 2014

Conversation

ninnemana
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

sysctl_param 'net.ipv4.ip_forward' do
value 1
only_if { node['platform'] == 'debian' }
unless node['docker']['ip_forward'] == true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this does the opposite of what I'd expect this attribute to do: setting ip_forward to true would not enable IP forwarding.

In any event, for conditionals surrounding a single resource, Chef convention is to use only_if and not_if inside the block, just like the only_if that's already inside sysctl_param. The fix would be changing this to: only_if { node['platform'] == 'debian' && node['docker']['ip_forward'] }

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're absolutely right, I wasn't sure if multiple conditions in the only_if were supported.

ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
<% else -%>
ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you create a second attribute for IPv6? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implementation detail: IPv4 would be inside its own if/end block while IPv6 would be inside its own if/end block.

@bflad
Copy link
Contributor

bflad commented Apr 10, 2014

Thanks for your hard work so far! I think we'll be good to merge this with these last changes.

@bflad
Copy link
Contributor

bflad commented Apr 12, 2014

I'm merging this in now and making the IPv6 forwarding changes myself. Will be included in next release. Thanks again!

@bflad bflad merged commit 4261bf4 into sous-chefs:master Apr 12, 2014
@ninnemana ninnemana deleted the gce branch April 18, 2014 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants