Removed urn association from ids

[jag3773]

No description provided.

[mvahowe]

Why do we need the sburrito prefix at all? The longer format made sense for a URN that might be used beyond Scripture Burrito. If that's still the plan, I think URNs still make sense. If that's not the plan, why don't we go back to the original plan which was to prefix system-specific identifiers with the organisation, ie

dbl::whatever
ptx::whatever

It's shorter and easier to read and I really can't see what value "sburrito" adds within a Scripture Burrito document. (I still prefer double colons because, if we no longer have a URN spec, it's possible that some system-specific ids will contain colons than that's the kind of thing that trips up application code, eg someone does

"yabe:123:456".split(":")[1]

they will not get the whole id (and this may be a surprise since, without a URN-type scheme, the don't know which arbitrary organization may turn up in the next document they read.)

[jag3773]

The idea discussed in the meeting revolved around "discoverability". However, if someone is looking at a SB metadata document, seems like they would know this is a SB :). I had initially thought an sb prefix would be a clean and concise way to include it in the id system, but I don't have any strong opinions on this one...

[mvahowe]

I am merging this with absolutely no coercion whatsoever.