Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Promote more BAM optional fields to first-class ADAMRecord fields #37

Closed
massie opened this issue Dec 16, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

Promote more BAM optional fields to first-class ADAMRecord fields #37

massie opened this issue Dec 16, 2013 · 2 comments
Labels
pick me up!

Comments

@massie
Copy link
Member

massie commented Dec 16, 2013

We currently only extract the optional MD tag to a proper record field named "mismatchingPositions". Updating the schema to include more optional fields would be a performance and compression win.
@tdanford
Copy link
Contributor

I'm in favor.

@massie massie mentioned this issue Feb 10, 2014
Closed
@iskandr iskandr mentioned this issue May 9, 2014
Closed
@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Closing in favor of targeted issues. @jey resolved part of this in #111, and we'll add additional fields in an upcoming PR that fixes #348.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
pick me up!
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@massie @tdanford @fnothaft