Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for newer Mojolicious #1

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

syohex
Copy link

@syohex syohex commented Mar 24, 2015

OOP interfaces of Mojo::JSON were removed. So we should use function interfaces of it
instead of OOP interfaces.

Object oriented 'Mojo::JSON' API ware removed from Mojo::JSON.
Mojo::JSON::encode_json, decode_json were implemented at Mojolicous@4.82
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 98.91% when pulling 96c8575 on syohex:newer-mojo into cc9de16 on binary-com:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 98.91% when pulling 96c8575 on syohex:newer-mojo into cc9de16 on binary-com:master.

@syohex syohex closed this Nov 24, 2022
@syohex syohex deleted the newer-mojo branch November 24, 2022 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants