Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Properly implement to_hash #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 30, 2012
Merged

Properly implement to_hash #44

merged 1 commit into from Dec 30, 2012

Conversation

cmer
Copy link
Contributor

@cmer cmer commented Oct 31, 2012

Without this, calling to_hash always returned a SettingsLogic instance, which caused problems when calling methods such as #symbolize_keys on the resulting object.

@PikachuEXE
Copy link

👍

@PikachuEXE
Copy link

There is also another pull request also for #to_hash: #25
Take a look

@PikachuEXE PikachuEXE mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2012
@bekkou68
Copy link

cool! clear implementation :)

@neersighted
Copy link

👍

@PikachuEXE
Copy link

But still not pulled...

@cmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmer commented Dec 28, 2012

Can this please be merged already? I believe my pull request is clean, well tested and fixes a weird oddity. Seems pretty straight forward to me. Thanks!

@PikachuEXE
Copy link

The members of the organization seem not quite active...
At least on this project

@bekkou68
Copy link

umm, what's going on.
the last pull request merged is 2 months ago, so this request may be already seen by authers.
6be535a

something problem? or what? please comment here...

binarylogic added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2012
Properly implement to_hash
@binarylogic binarylogic merged commit a905605 into binarylogic:master Dec 30, 2012
@cmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmer commented Dec 31, 2012

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants