Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Study and StudyPerson object #69

Closed
wants to merge 35 commits into from
Closed

Study and StudyPerson object #69

wants to merge 35 commits into from

Conversation

squirrelo
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #41 #55
Finally the big thing that all the tiny pull requests were for.

This is the study object itself, as well as the study person object that holds info on the people involved in a study. Please check this over and let me know if I missed any wanted functionality as well as the usual code stuff.

Also, the delete functionality is purposely not implemented currently. It will be hairy to do and not worth the time right now as the other objects need development an we aren't really deleting anything right now.

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
from __future__ import division

"""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you provide a full module level docstring? The one that is currently in is a placeholder. You can see an example here

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+31.02%) when pulling 6d144b4 on squirrelo:addstudy into 223b7f0 on biocore:master.

from .base import QiitaStatusObject, QiitaObject
from .data import RawData, PreprocessedData, ProcessedData
from .user import User

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extra white line

@josenavas
Copy link
Contributor

@squirrelo it looks like your documentation is outdated. Please, update all your docs and the related code. Check also the link I provided before to check the numpy docstring format.

Let me know when you're done with all these changes and I'll provide a full review. It's a waste of time doing partial reviews.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+31.02%) when pulling 61ed70b on squirrelo:addstudy into 223b7f0 on biocore:master.

@squirrelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, seems so. Updating it now.

@squirrelo squirrelo closed this Jun 2, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement qiita-db study object
3 participants