Drop JLD2.jl in favor of forked HDF5.jl #10
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 10.78% 10.78%
=======================================
Files 5 5
Lines 742 742
=======================================
Hits 80 80
Misses 662 662 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #7
As documented in that issue, we remove dependency on
JLD2.jl, and reading of.h5LD files is supported byHDF5.jllinked to my personal HDF5.jl fork. The reason is because HDF5.jl and JLD2.jl both contain lots ofRequires.@requirestatements, which seems like it cannot be compiled into apps