Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update faqs page #151

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 30, 2019
Merged

Update faqs page #151

merged 3 commits into from Mar 30, 2019

Conversation

m52go
Copy link
Contributor

@m52go m52go commented Mar 22, 2019

I never noticed, but this page needed a thorough revision. I left the questions intact, but heavily revised a lot of wording. Outdated items should be gone now too.

Anchor navigation works now too, as it was broken before.

Please pay special attention to the trade limits mentioned in the "What are the trade limits" section...I couldn't fully discern what's happening in the code, so the limits there are partially guesses.

These changes do not include any DAO FAQs (that's a separate PR), so they can be merged now.

faq.html Outdated
<p>Initially, traders make a list of arbitrators they approve. When a new trade is initiated, an arbitrator is randomly selected from among the traders&#8217; overlapping, approved selections. The more arbitrators a trader accepts, the more trades will be available to him.</p>
<p>Arbitrators determine solutions to trade disputes. Bisq&#8217;s arbitrators must pay a very high <a href="https://docs.bisq.network/dao/phase-zero.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BSQ bond</a>, which ensures fair evaluations and prevents collusion with traders.</p>
<p>Arbitrators are chosen randomly for each trade.</p>
<p>Soon after the DAO launch, the arbitrator system will be phased out with the launch of <a href='https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52' target='_blank'>a new trade protocol</a> that replaces arbitrators with mediators for better dispute resolution.</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We had recently changed in the new trade protocol to keep the arbitration for a while as optional feature.

Maybe just don't mention it here as the proposal is not updated as well.

<div class="accordion-content pb-5 col-sm-12 col-md-8 ml-0 pl-sm-0 pl-md-0 px-0">
<p>The required <a href="https://docs.bisq.network/dao/phase-zero.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BSQ bond</a> is very high and there are currently only very few people who have contributed enough to Bisq to have have earned so much BSQ.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the arbitration system will soon be phased out with the introduction of a <a href='https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52' target='_blank'>new trade protocol</a> that replaces arbitrators with mediators.</p>
</div>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again, maybe just leave it out now.

faq.html Outdated
</p>
<p>If the button does not appear, you can open a support ticket by the key combination cmd + o (or ctrl + o).</p>
<p>If the button does not appear, you can open a support ticket by hitting Cmd+O (or Ctrl+O, depending on your system).</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe keep it lower case o, otherwise it looks like zero or users try uppercase O

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Member

Trade limits are correct

Copy link
Member

@ManfredKarrer ManfredKarrer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ManfredKarrer ManfredKarrer merged commit 14cef88 into bisq-network:master Mar 30, 2019
@m52go m52go deleted the update-faqs branch May 1, 2019 03:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants