Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For October 2018 and before #151

Closed
cyphersphinx86 opened this issue Oct 30, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

For October 2018 and before #151

cyphersphinx86 opened this issue Oct 30, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cyphersphinx86
Copy link

cyphersphinx86 commented Oct 30, 2018

Summary

Primary coding DAO Parameter validations and tests for these. Secondary promoting Bisq at misc conferences during the year.

  • BSQ requested: 500
    Divided as:
    -3 x Helping promoting Bisq at conferences: 150
    -Participation in review and brainstorming: 50
    -Java code: 300

  • BSQ address: B1L9b6PkGMPBmvscxkPdLkVhN5HZUEkknzj

Contributions delivered

I have been promoting Bisq during networking sessions at various events over the last year. (34c3, BH18, HCPP18)

Minor participations in review and brainstorming processes over the last year.

Contributions in progress

I'm primarely seeking compensation for my work on 1769 which was taken of the planning board due to new refactoring plans for the DAO params. I did not know about these plans and could not hinder working for no reason.
So PR 1824 solves issue 1769, but won't get released.
I understand that it may conflict with the principles of proposal 19, but I was encouraged, by @ManfredKarrer to seek compensation anyways due to the situation.

Roles performed

  • Developer
  • Promoter
  • Reviewer
@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Member

I can confirm that it was my fault that he worked on a bounty task where later I did bigger changes so that his PR did not made sense to get merged anymore.

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Member

ManfredKarrer commented Oct 31, 2018

@cypherspace86 Could you split up the 650 BSQ which part is for the code task and the what for the promotion?

@cyphersphinx86
Copy link
Author

cyphersphinx86 commented Oct 31, 2018

Thanks @ManfredKarrer, I'm still figuring out the right way to write feasible compensation requests.
I have lowered the requested amount a bit and adjusted the proportions.

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Member

ripcurlx commented Nov 4, 2018

Closing as complete, see #149 (comment).

@ripcurlx ripcurlx closed this as completed Nov 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants