Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 10 #478

Closed
alexej996 opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

For Cycle 10 #478

alexej996 opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Milestone

Comments

@alexej996
Copy link
Member

Summary

This is a compensation request for work done in Cycle 9

  • BSQ requested: 200

Roles performed

@wiz
Copy link
Member

wiz commented Feb 11, 2020

👍

@wiz wiz removed their assignment Feb 11, 2020
@m52go m52go moved this from Waiting for Team Lead Review to Reviewed by Team Lead in Compensation Requests Feb 11, 2020
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Feb 14, 2020

Don't forget to submit proposal and publish tx ID.

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Feb 14, 2020

Proposal phase ends 15 feb 06:00 GMT, block 617.466.

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Feb 15, 2020

Please post in a comment the TX id for this compensation request.

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Member

@alexej996 Is this the correct tx id for your compensation request? https://bsq.sqrrm.net/tx.html?tx=9f250b2419c90a39eb5478f95e8307a800729112eabfecc17edfc32b13caeff7

I guess it might be confusing for users that there are two compensation requests for the same amount and the same value and nearly with the same id (478 and 487). Let's see who will check the issues in detail.

@cbeams cbeams added this to Review Complete in Compensation Request Board Feb 17, 2020
@cbeams cbeams moved this from Review Complete to In Review in Compensation Requests Feb 17, 2020
@cbeams cbeams moved this from In Review to Review Complete in Compensation Requests Feb 17, 2020
@alexej996
Copy link
Member Author

Both of the compensation requests are mine. I used to make them in a cycle after the one I did the work for, so I have more time to do the reports. There were some changes so we were asked to do them in a short period of time, so I did the one for this cycle as well.

I always ask for same amounts, since work is more or less always the same.
The issue's ID was just a coincidence :)

@MwithM MwithM added the was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting label Feb 22, 2020
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Feb 22, 2020

Was accepted

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Feb 22, 2020
Compensation Request Board automation moved this from Review Complete to Closed Feb 22, 2020
@cbeams cbeams added this to the Cycle 10 milestone Apr 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
was:accepted Indicates that a compensation request was accepted by DAO voting
Projects
Compensation Requests
  
Review Complete
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants