Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fee reimbursement for trade e7a57ihi #488

Closed
cddc123 opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Fee reimbursement for trade e7a57ihi #488

cddc123 opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
@leo816
Projects
Lost fee reimbursements

Comments

@cddc123
Copy link

cddc123 commented Sep 3, 2020 •
edited

Annotation 2020-09-03 152508

Maker: 3466590f7f070e5487c5f35738ed4ac8ec9991bcb657cd3979abad52fa31dcdd
Taker: 2af67acee78d0901e3aa5c8da61b6b6662c08346f5ed55dc65e6be25bda3b091
Deposit: b7f9d0112253a04c30e4db935f9e32580d944a8d7cea50741f9ec9bee7ffbdfc

Bisq version: 1.3.7

Other notes:
Buyer's taker fee was never broadcasted
@leo816 leo816 self-assigned this Sep 18, 2020
@leo816 leo816 added this to Todo in Lost fee reimbursements via automation Sep 18, 2020
@chimp1984
Copy link

Taker fee tx and deposit tx do not exist. Fee reimbursement is justified.

leo816 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2020
@leo816
Add txns for fee reimbursement #488
ebdd236
@leo816
Copy link
Contributor

leo816 commented Sep 23, 2020

Will be reimbursed with #481

@leo816 leo816 moved this from Todo to In progress in Lost fee reimbursements Sep 23, 2020
@leo816
Copy link
Contributor

leo816 commented Sep 25, 2020

Closing as reimbursed via the batch transaction documented at #481 (comment)

@leo816 leo816 closed this as completed Sep 25, 2020
Lost fee reimbursements automation moved this from In progress to Closed Sep 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@leo816 leo816

Labels
None yet
Projects
Lost fee reimbursements
  
Closed
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@chimp1984 @leo816 @cddc123