n28690: Update for newest patch set

_posts/2023-12-06-#28690.md

@@ -43,11 +43,9 @@ commit: de6d79847537cd7d0dfc3e2dd7a57b39b4281b5a
 
 7. Why does the `libbitcoinkernel_la_SOURCES` source file list specifically include `$(libbitcoin_util_a_SOURCES)` and `$(libbitcoin_consensus_a_SOURCES)` but `libbitcoin_kernel_a_SOURCES` doesn't seem to?
 
-8. [Commit 515c995](https://github.com/bitcoin-core-review-club/bitcoin/commit/515c9952829256f4c75c82d90f9ea4994b03baee) mentions: "Moving util/message.cpp to the common library also breaks an undocumented dependency of the util library on the consensus library's CPubKey::RecoverCompact symbol.". What was this dependency?
+8. [Commit 41a80de](https://github.com/bitcoin-core-review-club/bitcoin/commit/41a80de022691c9f5edd5cf715974fedadbffc12) mentions: "Moving util/message.cpp to the common library also breaks an undocumented dependency of the util library on the consensus library's CPubKey::RecoverCompact symbol.". What was this dependency?
 
-9.  [Commit 515c995](https://github.com/bitcoin-core-review-club/bitcoin/commit/515c9952829256f4c75c82d90f9ea4994b03baee) introduces a `shift-base:common/bip32.cpp` suppression in `test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan`. Why do we need this?
-
-10. [Commit de6d798](https://github.com/bitcoin-core-review-club/bitcoin/commit/de6d79847537cd7d0dfc3e2dd7a57b39b4281b5a) de-duplicates the source file list. Are there any changes to the source file list used for `libbitcoinkernel`?
+9. [Commit 5a6a0b1](https://github.com/bitcoin-core-review-club/bitcoin/commit/5a6a0b1693cf739a5e6cc1161160a1d621d215f9) de-duplicates the source file list. Are there any changes to the source file list used for `libbitcoinkernel`?
 
 <!-- TODO: After a meeting, uncomment and add meeting log between the irc tags
 ## Meeting Log