Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the extremely outdated TODO file. #805

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2020
Merged

Remove the extremely outdated TODO file. #805

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2020

Conversation

gmaxwell
Copy link
Contributor

This had two things in it-- tests for the scalar/field code and
constant time signing and keygen.

The signing and keygen have been thoroughly constant time for years
and there are now powerful tests to verify it... no further work
on constant-time is needed at least on ordinary platforms (other
sidechannels-- sure).

The scalar and field code have extensive tests. They could use
better static test vectors but they're well tested.

TODOs for the project are currently better documented on github
right now. This file could return in the future with current
info, if needed.

This had two things in it-- tests for the scalar/field code and
 constant time signing and keygen.

The signing and keygen have been thoroughly constant time for years
 and there are now powerful tests to verify it...  no further work
 on constant-time is needed at least on ordinary platforms (other
 sidechannels-- sure).

The scalar and field code have extensive tests.  They could use
 better static test vectors but they're well tested.

TODOs for the project are currently better documented on github
 right now.  This file could return in the future with current
 info, if needed.
@real-or-random
Copy link
Contributor

ACK 1c32519

@sipa
Copy link
Contributor

sipa commented Sep 1, 2020

Last updated in 2013 (7b03d83)

ACK

@real-or-random real-or-random merged commit f5adab1 into bitcoin-core:master Sep 1, 2020
@gmaxwell gmaxwell deleted the 202008-notodo branch September 1, 2020 09:05
jasonbcox pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
Summary:
This had two things in it-- tests for the scalar/field code and
 constant time signing and keygen.

The signing and keygen have been thoroughly constant time for years
 and there are now powerful tests to verify it...  no further work
 on constant-time is needed at least on ordinary platforms (other
 sidechannels-- sure).

The scalar and field code have extensive tests.  They could use
 better static test vectors but they're well tested.

TODOs for the project are currently better documented on github
 right now.  This file could return in the future with current
 info, if needed.

This is a backport of secp256k1 [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#805 | PR805]]

Test Plan:
  \o/

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, jasonbcox

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, jasonbcox

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D7606
deadalnix pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/secp256k1 that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2020
Summary:
This had two things in it-- tests for the scalar/field code and
 constant time signing and keygen.

The signing and keygen have been thoroughly constant time for years
 and there are now powerful tests to verify it...  no further work
 on constant-time is needed at least on ordinary platforms (other
 sidechannels-- sure).

The scalar and field code have extensive tests.  They could use
 better static test vectors but they're well tested.

TODOs for the project are currently better documented on github
 right now.  This file could return in the future with current
 info, if needed.

This is a backport of secp256k1 [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#805 | PR805]]

Test Plan:
  \o/

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, jasonbcox

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, jasonbcox

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D7606
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants