Permalink
Find file
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
140 lines (79 sloc) 7.05 KB

  BIP: 146
  Layer: Consensus (soft fork)
  Title: Dealing with signature encoding malleability
  Author: Johnson Lau <jl2012@xbt.hk>
          Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
  Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
  Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0146
  Status: Draft
  Type: Standards Track
  Created: 2016-08-16
  License: PD

Table of Contents

Abstract

This document specifies proposed changes to the Bitcoin transaction validity rules to fix signature malleability related to ECDSA signature encoding.

Motivation

Signature malleability refers to the ability of any relay node on the network to transform the signature in transactions, with no access to the relevant private keys required. For non-segregated witness transactions, signature malleability will change the txid and invalidate any unconfirmed child transactions. Although the txid of segregated witness (BIP141) transactions is not third party malleable, this malleability vector will change the wtxid and may reduce the efficiency of compact block relay (BIP152).

Since the enforcement of Strict DER signatures (BIP66), there are 2 remaining known sources of malleability in ECDSA signatures:

  1. Inherent ECDSA signature malleability: ECDSA signatures are inherently malleable as taking the negative of the number S inside (modulo the curve order) does not invalidate it.
  2. Malleability of failing signature: If a signature failed to validate in OP_CHECKSIG or OP_CHECKMULTISIG, a FALSE would be returned to the stack and the script evaluation would continue. The failing signature may take any value, as long as it follows all the rules described in BIP66.
This document specifies new rules to fix the aforesaid signature malleability.

Specification

To fix signature encoding malleability, the following new rules are applied to pre-segregated witness and segregated witness scripts:

LOW_S

We require that the S value inside ECDSA signatures is at most the curve order divided by 2 (essentially restricting this value to its lower half range). Every signature passed to OP_CHECKSIG[1], OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY, OP_CHECKMULTISIG, or OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY, to which ECDSA verification is applied, MUST use a S value between 0x1 and 0x7FFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF 5D576E73 57A4501D DFE92F46 681B20A0 (inclusive) with strict DER encoding (see BIP66).

If a signature passing to ECDSA verification does not pass the Low S value check and is not an empty byte array, the entire script evaluates to false immediately.

A high S value in signature could be trivially replaced by S' = 0xFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFE BAAEDCE6 AF48A03B BFD25E8C D0364141 - S.

NULLFAIL

If an OP_CHECKSIG is trying to return a FALSE value to the stack, we require that the relevant signature must be an empty byte array.

If an OP_CHECKMULTISIG is trying to return a FALSE value to the stack, we require that all signatures passing to this OP_CHECKMULTISIG must be empty byte arrays, even the processing of some signatures might have been skipped due to early termination of the signature verification.

Otherwise, the entire script evaluates to false immediately.

Examples

The following examples are the combined results of the LOW_S and NULLFAIL rules.[2]

Notation:

  CO       : curve order = 0xFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFE BAAEDCE6 AF48A03B BFD25E8C D0364141
  HCO      : half curve order = CO / 2 = 0x7FFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF 5D576E73 57A4501D DFE92F46 681B20A0
  P1, P2   : valid, serialized, public keys
  S1L, S2L : valid low S value signatures using respective keys P1 and P2 (1 ≤ S ≤ HCO)
  S1H, S2H : signatures with high S value (otherwise valid) using respective keys P1 and P2 (HCO < S < CO)
  F        : any BIP66-compliant non-empty byte array but not a valid signature

These scripts will return a TRUE to the stack as before:

  S1L P1 CHECKSIG
  0 S1L S2L 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG

These scripts will return a FALSE to the stack as before:

  0 P1 CHECKSIG
  0 0 0 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG

These previously TRUE scripts will fail immediately under the new rules:

  S1H P1 CHECKSIG
  0 S1H S2L 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 S1L S2H 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 S1H S2H 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG

These previously FALSE scripts will fail immediately under the new rules:

  F P1 CHECKSIG
  0 S2L S1L 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 S1L F   2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 F   S2L 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 S1L 0   2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 0   S2L 2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 F   0   2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG
  0 0   F   2 P1 P2 2 CHECKMULTISIG

Deployment

This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9. Details TBD.

For Bitcoin mainnet, the BIP9 starttime will be midnight TBD UTC (Epoch timestamp TBD) and BIP9 timeout will be midnight TBD UTC (Epoch timestamp TBD).

For Bitcoin testnet, the BIP9 starttime will be midnight TBD UTC (Epoch timestamp TBD) and BIP9 timeout will be midnight TBD UTC (Epoch timestamp TBD).

Compatibility

The reference client has produced LOW_S compatible signatures since v0.9.0, and the LOW_S rule has been enforced as relay policy by the reference client since v0.11.1. As of August 2016, very few transactions violating the requirement are being added to the chain. For all scriptPubKey types in actual use, non-compliant signatures can trivially be converted into compliant ones, so there is no loss of functionality by these requirements.

Scripts with failing OP_CHECKSIG or OP_CHECKMULTISIG rarely happen on the chain. The NULLFAIL rule has been enforced as relay policy by the reference client since v0.13.1.

Users MUST pay extra attention to these new rules when designing exotic scripts.

Implementation

Implementations for the reference client is available at:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/35fe0393f216aa6020fc929272118eade5628636/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L185

and

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8634

Footnotes

  1. ^ Including pay-to-witness-public-key-hash (P2WPKH) described in BIP141
  2. ^ Please note that due to implementation details in reference client v0.13.1, some signatures with S value higher than the half curve order might pass the LOW_S test. However, such signatures are certainly invalid, and will fail later due to NULLFAIL test.

Acknowledgements

This document is extracted from the previous BIP62 proposal which had input from various people.

Copyright

This document is placed in the public domain.