Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Compare scaling solutions (e.g., sidechains) #332

Open
Geremia opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion: Compare scaling solutions (e.g., sidechains) #332

Geremia opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@Geremia
Copy link

Geremia commented May 25, 2017

A chapter or appendix comparing the various scaling solutions would be good.

Discussing side-chaining, and how it could help with the scaling problem, would be good, too:

Mastering Blockchain, for example, only has this on sidechains:

Sidechains
More precisely known as pegged sidechains, this is a concept whereby coins can be moved from one blockchain to another and moved back. Common uses include the creation of new altcoins (alternative cryptocurrencies) whereby coins are burnt as a proof of adequate stake. There are two types of sidechain. The example provided above for burning coins is applicable to a one-way pegged sidechain. The second type is called a two-way pegged sidechain, which allows the movement of coins from the main chain to the sidechain and back to the main chain when required.

Sidechains (cf. Blockstream / the whitepaper, Elements Project / its GitHub repo, etc.) could be elaborated upon in Mastering Bitcoin's 2nd ed., perhaps in a section comparing all the various scaling solutions.

@Geremia Geremia changed the title Suggestion: Discuss scaling solutions (e.g., sidechains) Suggestion: Compare scaling solutions (e.g., sidechains) May 25, 2017
@wbnns wbnns self-assigned this Jun 25, 2017
@wbnns
Copy link
Collaborator

wbnns commented Jul 3, 2017

@Geremia Thanks for the suggestion. Leaving this open so that it can be considered as potential new content to include in the future.

@aantonop aantonop added this to the third edition milestone Jul 18, 2017
@wbnns wbnns added the pending label Aug 24, 2017
@wbnns wbnns removed their assignment Mar 3, 2018
@wbnns wbnns modified the milestones: 3rd Edition, Suggested Content May 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants