Workaround for securityContext.fsGroup not taking effect.
#734
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
calind
changed the title
securityContext.fsGroup not taking effect.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes/fixes #615
Some PV provisioners don't take into account the
securityContext.fsGroup(see rancher/local-path-provisioner#41 for example). This was fixed in #729 but it required running a container with root permissions. Now the fix is placed under a flagorchestrator.persistence.fsGroupWorkaroundEnabledand users MUST explicitly allow running containers with root, by settingsecurityContext.runAsNonRoottofalse.