-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 405
Web Vault v2.0 Public Preview/Beta Test #217
Comments
Is this normal that so many icons are missing in this preview? https://i.imgur.com/8J5Vyyn.png |
@playfriik If you refresh do they come up? Icons are fetched from a new endpoint in v2.0, so they probably are not cached yet and are still being fetched by the icons server |
Refreshing didn't help, even opening the Chrome in incognito mode doesn't show the icons. |
@playfriik @heubergen What do browser tools show in network tab? Is it try to fetch the icons or what? |
@kspearrin This is what my browsers network tab shows: https://i.imgur.com/QDecCCB.png |
same here (firefox nightly 63.x) |
Looks like it's cached on disk as a 404. Try clearing browser cache and refreshing. The icon seems to work when I request it now. |
All icons show normally here. |
000webhost works here but xing not (in private mode and with different browser checked) |
Shouldn't incognito mode ignore disk cache? |
I guess not. It is definitely pulling from local browser cache. |
That's what I get after clearing browser cache (first time): https://i.imgur.com/tJaQheb.png |
Firefox is giving me a spinning mouse cursor as the page tries to download hundreds of favicons at the same time. For me it’s 1.2 megabyte of favicons. People on slower connections and more expensive data plans than me don’t appreciate loading resources they might not need. E.g. this would be painful to load over satellite. How about only loading favicons progressively. It’ not like you loose a whole lot of functionality if an icons is delayed and loads a bit slower. Maybe only load for three times the number of sites that are visible on screen? (So currently visible sites plus two screens of scrolling worth of favicons.) |
Nice job @kspearrin, thank you 👍 |
@Mart124 Yes, this was discussed in the channel and would have issues when the sidebars themselves are greater than 100% height of the window. |
I've found a minor, cosmetic, issue. When you try to "share/move/delete selected" with no ciphers selected, it still tries to do the action instead of telling the user that no cipher has been selected or the options being greyed out. It ends up calling the relevant API with empty cipher list, so no harm done, but I guess the user should be told somehow that nothing has been selected as it might lead to users thinking they made some operation when they didn't due to miss-click or something like that. |
@mprasil Fixed with error message. Thanks. |
is there a docker tag for this beta so us self-hosters can try it out? |
Beta test is over. Web vault is now live here: https://vault.bitwarden.com/ We will release this update to docker for self-hosted users in the coming days. |
I do have one comment though, it would be a performance improvement kind of thing. Right now the vault search function is a real-time sort of search, I suggest that the search function only activates after the user presses the Enter key. |
I have to disagree from my experience; I'm currently using an eight year old notebook and I don't have any performance issue with the new vault. |
It depends upon how many saved items you have, of which I have a lot. The new vault is a whole lot better than the old vault in terms of searching it, it's definitely a whole lot faster however putting the option to require pressing the Enter key could help those of us who have 500+ items in our vaults. |
@trparky, it could be provided as an option : activated by default and switch off if you have performance issue ? Either way, maybe it would be better to track this in a feature request at https://community.bitwarden.com 🙂 |
The web vault has been completely re-written from the ground up. As such, we are releasing a public preview for users to test and provide feedback.
You can access the web vault v2.0 preview at https://vault.bitwarden.com/preview/
You can log in with and use your existing Bitwarden account.
Noteworthy Changes
Feedback
Please leave comments here regarding any feedback, questions, missing features, or bug reports. Do not open new issues. We hope to release this version officially next week.
Additional Note
This re-write is a great step forward for Bitwarden development since it shares a significant amount of code with other Bitwarden applications (browser extension, desktop, CLI, etc). This will allow us to iterate faster with improving and adding new features going forward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: