Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(): Edits for sonarCloud critical code smells #157

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Apr 24, 2020

Conversation

crowleySynopsys
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Edits for Critical code smells according to SonarCloud. Included classes have what I consider to be reasonable test coverage, or the edits are minor enough that they pose no risk.

@blackduck-copilot
Copy link

blackduck-copilot bot commented Apr 22, 2020

Black Duck Security Report

Merging #157 into master will not change security risk.

Click here to see full report

Copy link
Contributor

@JakeMathews JakeMathews left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In addition to the comments, I am a little concerned about including DetectorTool in this PR. It's risky. Our only test for that class ensures that it fails when it's supposed to, but does not test the positive case. Perhaps that class is a candidate for 6.4.0.

@crowleySynopsys crowleySynopsys merged commit 95afbea into master Apr 24, 2020
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 24, 2020

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 5 Code Smells

61.7% 61.7% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@dmamidisynopsys dmamidisynopsys deleted the sonarCloudLowRiskClassEdits branch May 22, 2023 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants