Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update framework and FakeItEasy support #89

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

blairconrad
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@blairconrad blairconrad changed the title Update post fake it easy 7.0.0 Update framework and FakeItEasy support Mar 17, 2021
@blairconrad
Copy link
Owner Author

Ha, @thomaslevesque. I just realized I had this hanging around from nigh 36 months ago!

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[assembly: System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComVisible(false)]
[assembly: System.Runtime.InteropServices.Guid("08462e29-25c0-4a1f-9275-23b7898e95f0")]
[assembly: System.Runtime.Versioning.TargetFramework(".NETStandard,Version=v1.6", FrameworkDisplayName="")]
[assembly: System.Runtime.Versioning.TargetFramework(".NETStandard,Version=v5.0", FrameworkDisplayName="")]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I realize you didn't manually write this, but... .NET Standard 5.0? I don't think this target framework exists!

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Who knows. Maybe I did write it. Maybe I just copied the file and changed the version number! I might do that. FakeItEasy has

.NETCoreApp,Version=v5.0

And... I can't run the Api tests locally! They hang! But not for FakeItEasy…

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's weird... but they run on AppVeyor? They should have failed, then, shouldn't they? Since the received and approved files would have been different...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants