first move from a simple doc to a dev portal

[nweldev]

Update for https://github.com/blindnet-io/communication-management/issues/142

• close blindnet-io/product-ideas#13
• close blindnet-io/product-ideas#7
• close blindnet-io/product-ideas#11
• add dev.to (see 📌 create a blindnet org on dev.to devrel-management#45)
• asd Slack (see 📌 open our Slack Org devrel-management#46)
• add incentives to star the repo, join our Slack, and follow us on twitter
• improve overall theme and presentation
• replace blindet-docs with blindnet.dev
• add Slack invite (see 📌 open our Slack Org devrel-management#46)

Note

This PR introduce a new brand color for blindnet.dev, close to "Lilliputian Lime": 88dc4c.

It is a complementary colour to the (close to) "Fandango Pink" colour we already use for the blindnet.io and Privateform brands, dc4c87.

Both can work as a triadic with a colour close to "Andrea Blue", 4c87dc, which could be later used as a secondary colour on both websites, or for another brand.

[nweldev]

Warning

The new texts on the home page require special attention during the review.
@milstan I added you as a review for this part only (don't bother with the rest).

[filipblnt]

General comment, the green colour of the links is not so visible in the light theme, check it out. Maybe we'll need to make it more stronger. In the dark mode it works quite well.

[milstan]

@noelmace I am not sure what you are reffering to when you say "new texts", but everything I see here looks OK to me.

[nweldev]

@filipblnt What do you mean by "not visible"?

I see different possible issues:

1. links not "standing out" enough
   • ✔️ OK example (home page)
     
   • ❓ possibly NOK example (http://localhost:3000/docs/introduction#how-to-use-it)
     
2. contrast issue on gray backgrounds
   • for example in the footer
     

As indicated in 5ed1da8, I used https://docusaurus.io/docs/styling-layout to find the right colours. But I forgot about (2), as Docusaurus is kind of a mess on this. I'll fix it right away.

For (1.2), I can't see what we should do here. IMHO, this is OK. Shifting to a lighter colour (like 108a03 for example) would break the accessibility. We could use a bold or underlined font, but I don't think it would be a very good solution. Any suggestion?

[nweldev]

@milstan thx for the review. FYI, I was reffering to the new sections in the home page.

[nweldev]

@m4rk055 except if @filipblnt has any other feedback, you can now merge and release this in production.

[filipblnt]

@noelmace #16 (comment)

I meant 1, I personally think that links in 1.2 are not standing our enough.

[nweldev]

Thx for the merge @filipblnt. I added a new issue #17 to remember me to investigate your feedback on links' colour.