Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic difficulty start check #18

Closed
hihiben opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Dynamic difficulty start check #18

hihiben opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@hihiben
Copy link
Contributor

hihiben commented Apr 18, 2016

Node在重啟時由於讀入cache的狀態和checkblock時的時間點會不一樣,加上由於無法紀錄在各個block height時當下的alliance狀態,可能造成重啟時dynamic difficulty check failure

hihiben added a commit to hihiben/gcoin-community that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2016
Difficulty check is not necessary to guarantee the correctness of
block. Remove t=it to avoid the restart failure that may caused
by the dynamic difficulty check.
hihiben added a commit to hihiben/gcoin-community that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2016
Difficulty check is not necessary to guarantee the correctness of
block. Remove it to avoid the restart failure that may caused by
the dynamic difficulty check.
willliw added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2016
Remove difficulty check when verifyDB #18
hihiben added a commit to hihiben/gcoin-community that referenced this issue May 10, 2016
@hihiben hihiben self-assigned this May 11, 2016
willliw added a commit that referenced this issue May 12, 2016
Record miner when UpdateList #18
lbyyy pushed a commit to lbyyy/gcoin-community that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2016
Difficulty check is not necessary to guarantee the correctness of
block. Remove it to avoid the restart failure that may caused by
the dynamic difficulty check.
This was referenced Jul 1, 2016
@lbyyy
Copy link
Contributor

lbyyy commented Nov 22, 2016

solved

@lbyyy lbyyy closed this as completed Nov 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants