Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Krypton deployment + adjustments #1896

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 23, 2020
Merged

Krypton deployment + adjustments #1896

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 23, 2020

Conversation

lgalabru
Copy link
Contributor

@lgalabru lgalabru commented Sep 21, 2020

Additional adjustments:

120,
30,
20,
3333333333333333) // total liquid supply is 40000000000000000 µSTX
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, 8.3% of liquid uSTX can disable PoX?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Am I misunderstanding #1882?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@lgalabru lgalabru Sep 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ha, I think 1/120th of liquid supply is the minimum for stacking. What should we use for pox_rejection_fraction (cc @jcnelson @kantai) ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

8.3% is fine by me -- I'm in favor of a low threshold so the community can easily test it out. I was just curious if there was a particular reason for the precise number.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, 8.3% works for me -- if someone griefs the PoX anchor blocks, we can always bump it up

Copy link
Member

@jcnelson jcnelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @lgalabru

Copy link
Member

@kantai kantai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@@ -934,9 +934,9 @@ impl PeerHost {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct RPCPeerInfoData {
pub peer_version: u32,
pub burn_consensus: ConsensusHash,
pub pox_consensus: ConsensusHash,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pox_consensus makes sense here 👍

@lgalabru lgalabru merged commit 86b184e into feat/pox-network Sep 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants