Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1742/relocate formatIncome #1744

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 1, 2021
Merged

1742/relocate formatIncome #1744

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 1, 2021

Conversation

emilyjablonski
Copy link
Collaborator

@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski commented Aug 25, 2021

Pull Request Template

Issue

Addresses #1742

  • This change addresses the issue in full
  • This change addresses only certain aspects of the issue
  • This change is a dependency for another issue
  • This change has a dependency from another issue

Description

Initial issue was to remove business logic from formatIncome since it uses backend types and lived in ui-components, but I just don't think this should live in ui-components. I moved it to partners helpers.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Prototype/POC (not to merge)
  • This change is a refactor/address technical debt
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires a SQL Script

How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?

Just moved the same function :) It's only used in paper applications on partners.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have reviewed the changes in a desktop view
  • I have reviewed the changes in a mobile view
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have assigned reviewers
  • I have updated the changelog to include a description of my changes

@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski added the wip This PR is not ready for review, do not review it's a “Work In Progress” label Aug 25, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 25, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for dev-bloom ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 499181d

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/dev-bloom/deploys/612fb6bf980dea0007eb0260

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1744--dev-bloom.netlify.app

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 25, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for dev-partners-bloom ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 499181d

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/dev-partners-bloom/deploys/612fb6bfe237cc00090b16b6

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1744--dev-partners-bloom.netlify.app

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 25, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for dev-storybook-bloom ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 499181d

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/dev-storybook-bloom/deploys/612fb6bf9a294d00081c0ff3

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1744--dev-storybook-bloom.netlify.app

Base automatically changed from dev to master August 25, 2021 17:59
@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski changed the base branch from master to dev August 25, 2021 18:01
@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski added ready for review and removed wip This PR is not ready for review, do not review it's a “Work In Progress” labels Aug 25, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@seanmalbert seanmalbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, @emilyjablonski. Before merging this, can you create an issue to add unit testing to partners and add back in the formatIncome tests and have the partner unit tests run in circleci.

@emilyjablonski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#1786 👍

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 1, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for clever-edison-cd22c1 ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 499181d

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/clever-edison-cd22c1/deploys/612fb6bf60c466000843a568

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1744--clever-edison-cd22c1.netlify.app

@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski merged commit b5f54e1 into dev Sep 1, 2021
seanmalbert pushed a commit to CityOfDetroit/bloom that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2022
@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski deleted the 1742/helpers branch July 20, 2022 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants