Setup codecov #36
Merged
Setup codecov #36
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #36 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 94.82%
=========================================
Files ? 39
Lines ? 1663
Branches ? 0
=========================================
Hits ? 1577
Misses ? 86
Partials ? 0Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
marciniwanicki
force-pushed
the
feature/setup-codecov
branch
2 times, most recently
from
34561c9
to
44cc7f0
Compare
marciniwanicki
force-pushed
the
feature/setup-codecov
branch
from
db2d853
to
981d9a1
Compare
Signed-off-by: Marcin Iwanicki <miwanicki1@bloomberg.net>
marciniwanicki
force-pushed
the
feature/setup-codecov
branch
from
981d9a1
to
b3dfbdd
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
Set up codecov.io to make the code coverage data more visible for the contributors.
Testing performed
I was primarily testing the integration locally and via this PR.
Additional context
Thanks @kwridan for pushing back on xcodebuild. Using
swift testis a way better option. Glad I've found @wnagrodzki 's comment (https://community.codecov.io/t/swift-package-support/675)