Fix function comments based on best practices from Effective Go #28
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: CodeLingo Bot <bot@codelingo.io>
|
I'm not sold on the use of colons here. Happy to hear feedback on this strategy and how I could fix the automation logic. Thanks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Every exported function in a program should have a doc comment. The first sentence should be a summary that starts with the name being declared.
From effective go.
I generated this with CodeLingo and I'm keen to get some feedback, but this is automated so feel free to close it and just say "opt out" to opt out of future CodeLingo outreach PRs.