new Class().method() has incorrect precedence

[jcdickinson]

The precedence in new Class().method() isn't correct. This expression is parsed as new (Class().method()), which is incorrect, the correct parse tree would be equivalent to (new Class()).method().

A real-world example is new Date().getTime().

[jasonwilliams]

Tokens for new Date().getTime()

[boa\src\lib.rs:26] &tokens = [
    Token {
        data: Keyword(
            New,
        ),
        pos: Position {        
            column_number: 1,  
            line_number: 1,    
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Identifier(      
            "Date",
        ),
        pos: Position {        
            column_number: 5,  
            line_number: 1,    
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Punctuator(      
            OpenParen,
        ),
        pos: Position {        
            column_number: 9,  
            line_number: 1,    
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Punctuator(      
            CloseParen,        
        ),
        pos: Position {       
            column_number: 10,
            line_number: 1,   
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Punctuator(     
            Dot,
        ),
        pos: Position {       
            column_number: 11,
            line_number: 1,   
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Identifier(     
            "getTime",        
        ),
        pos: Position {       
            column_number: 12,
            line_number: 1,   
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Punctuator(     
            OpenParen,        
        ),
        pos: Position {       
            column_number: 19,
            line_number: 1,
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Punctuator(
            CloseParen,
        ),
        pos: Position {
            column_number: 20,
            line_number: 1,
        },
    },
    Token {
        data: Punctuator(
            Semicolon,
        ),
        pos: Position {
            column_number: 21,
            line_number: 1,
        },
    },
]

Tokens looks fine

Parser output

[boa\src\lib.rs:27] &expr = Expr {
    def: Block(
        [
            Expr {
                def: Construct(
                    Expr {
                        def: GetConstField(        
                            Expr {
                                def: Call(
                                    Expr {
                                        def: Local(
                                            "Date",
                                        ),
                                    },
                                    [],
                                ),
                            },
                            "getTime",
                        ),
                    },    
                    [],   
                ),        
            },
        ],
    ),
}

Yeah looks like there'll need to be some work here:
https://github.com/jasonwilliams/boa/blob/master/boa/src/syntax/parser/mod.rs#L232-L240

[jasonwilliams]

Upon deeper inspection the issue is around here: https://github.com/jasonwilliams/boa/blob/master/boa/src/syntax/parser/mod.rs#L688-L721

Normally it just carries on, which is why it continues parsing until the method.
There needs to be some signal to stop after the first call.

[jasonwilliams]

if we stopped after here https://github.com/jasonwilliams/boa/blob/master/boa/src/syntax/parser/mod.rs#L719 it would break other things such as function chaining

[jasonwilliams]

Might be worth making the parser more spec compliant https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-left-hand-side-expressions

[jasonwilliams]

jasonwilliams#274
jasonwilliams#225

[jasonwilliams]

new output since 0.7

StatementList(
    [
        Call(
            GetConstField(
                New(
                    Call(
                        Local(     
                            "Date",
                        ),
                        [],        
                    ),
                ),
                "getTime",
            ),
            [],
        ),
    ],
)

The precedence looks fixed here
@HalidOdat @Razican ?

[Razican]

The precedence looks fixed here
@HalidOdat @Razican ?

It looks good, yes! Might be worth adding a test for this?

[HalidOdat]

It looks good, yes! Might be worth adding a test for this?

Are you adding the test, or should I?

[jasonwilliams]

im doing it now