Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filename for Fragments #42

Closed
ahankinson opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

Filename for Fragments #42

ahankinson opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ahankinson
Copy link
Contributor

The file Fragments_printed_books/A_1_11_Art_Seld_pastedowns.xml should be renamed to MS_A_1_11_Art_Seld_pastedowns.xml.

@ahankinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Assigning Matthew & James since it's possible that this is not a simple renaming process.

@holfordm
Copy link
Collaborator

holfordm commented Jul 4, 2017

This folder is for manuscript fragments in printed books (a small cataloguing programme that is in progress as part of the "fragmentarium" project). The shelfmark therefore really is "A 1 11 Art Seld, pastedown". "A 1 11 Art Seld" is the shelmark of a printed book and the ms fragment that the description is concerned with, is a pastedown in the binding. Does this make sense?

@ahankinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, it makes sense -- the filenames and the XML IDs need to be standardized, though.

@holfordm
Copy link
Collaborator

holfordm commented Jul 4, 2017

Feel free to make any necessary changes now and perhaps we can discuss the standardization principles when I'm back in Oxford? I had been thinking that the "manuscript_xxx" xml:id was the imporant bit...

@ahankinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

My understanding was that James' normalization process was making the filenames and the xml:ids match.

@holfordm
Copy link
Collaborator

holfordm commented Jul 5, 2017

James add two xml:ids to each descrption (a) on msDesc, this is the same as the normalized filename (b) on TEI, this is in the form "manuscript_xxx", and I think for consistency we should use (b) for the URLs and indexing, cf issue 28

@holfordm
Copy link
Collaborator

since we have switched to using numeric IDs, can this be closed?

@jamescummings
Copy link
Contributor

It was making the filenames and IDs match, but if needing it changed now then it should be done manually.

@holfordm
Copy link
Collaborator

holfordm commented Dec 4, 2017

Modified schematron now checks that ID and filename match

@holfordm holfordm closed this as completed Dec 4, 2017
holfordm pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants