-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BadAccess, BadShmSeg #60
Comments
Could you try running it as To apply this fix permenatly add |
Hi there, thanks for putting this together! I had the same issue upon trying to run I tried running When I try using howdy normally it just times out and I have to enter the password. I assume it's because the image is not actually dynamic (i.e. not even recognizing something that resembles a face). |
This is a known decoding error in some cameras, could you try running |
OK, did that and the test procedure gives an actual image -- great! I just added two versions of my face (with and without glasses) to my profile then tried a few tests. Unfortunately I still get the timeout problem, so I still have to enter my password manually. |
Try upping the |
I upped the I noticed that when I run the test procedure, the frame rate and exposure consistency seems to depend heavily on the distance between my face and the emitters/camera. Still, even when I added a new face based on the distance and position I felt was most consistent in the test procedure, I still get the timeout errors. Any other suggestions? |
Following up on issues i forgot to reply to, are you still having this problem or did you fix it/uninstall Howdy? |
Hi, thanks for checking in. I disabled (but didn't uninstall) Howdy because
I could never get it to recognize me, no matter how much I tweaked the
parameters. I had written earlier about how the output was just greenish
static when I used the "sudo howdy test" command, so perhaps the
authentication routine is getting the same data every time it turns on the
camera and of course it in no way resembles a face.
…On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:48 AM boltgolt ***@***.***> wrote:
Following up on issues i forgot to reply to, are you still having this
problem or did you fix it/uninstall Howdy?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#60 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AoT2S8yL8kX54v949QXRJge38pwuLLAZks5uhb1UgaJpZM4VvIJN>
.
|
Greenish static is a new symptom for me, does this static also show up when you open Cheese (search for Cheese in the dash)? You might need to try out different webcams/video sizes in the Preferences menu. |
Indeed it does show up initially in Cheese because the default camera is
the one associated with the IR emitters. I always have to select the normal
webcam in the Preferences menu to get a clear picture.
…On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:41 PM boltgolt ***@***.***> wrote:
Greenish static is a new symptom for me, does this static also show up
when you open Cheese (search for Cheese in the dash)? You might need to try
out different webcams/video sizes in the Preferences menu.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#60 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AoT2S8CoWbMBlMSLNypNGI91V6A6ly_6ks5uhlZQgaJpZM4VvIJN>
.
|
So Cheese is also just getting the garbage data? Does switching resolutions in the preferences change anything? |
Yep, the cheese default is the IR camera at 480x400 and it's the green
garbage. Upon switching resolutions to 400x400 it looks as expected,
however.
…On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:53 AM boltgolt ***@***.***> wrote:
So Cheese is also just getting the garbage data? Does switching
resolutions in the preferences change anything?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#60 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AoT2S_tNxTGCH7SYr_2Y2S9wsiN37Toeks5uhywfgaJpZM4VvIJN>
.
|
Great! Could you set the frame size in
This should fix the problem. |
Had the same problem, running it with |
I had exactly the same issue. 1 - To fix green image: 2 - To fix testing interface: 3 - Finally to get the correct detection, including the red circle in howdy test, I had to set bright and contrast the parameters in v4l:
Doing this, I had no more problem with detection using IR camera. |
Please describe the issue in as much detail as possible, including any errors and traces
I get this when i run the test command
X Error: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) 10
Extension: 130 (MIT-SHM)
Minor opcode: 1 (X_ShmAttach)
Resource id: 0x2e00003
X Error: BadShmSeg (invalid shared segment parameter) 128
Extension: 130 (MIT-SHM)
Minor opcode: 5 (X_ShmCreatePixmap)
Resource id: 0x2e0000d
Linux distribution (if applicable): Ubuntu 18.04.1
Howdy version:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: