You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As we are now (see #64) able to fit models with mstop = 0 we should be also able to
extract a sensible risk for the offset model.
allow cross-validation starting from 0, i.e., allow that no base-learner is selected.
Perhaps, we have to fix predict and fitted for an offset model. Currently, a scalar is returned bu actually a constant vector of offsets might be more suitable. However, we then need to make sure that the subset function in mboost_fit works as desired.
The first point might introduce a lot of changes as we cannot assess a vectors zeroth element (hence all risks are shifted by one index). Consequently using the extractor function risk.mboost() might avoid to many changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As we are now (see #64) able to fit models with
mstop = 0
we should be also able topredict
andfitted
for an offset model. Currently, a scalar is returned bu actually a constant vector of offsets might be more suitable. However, we then need to make sure that thesubset
function inmboost_fit
works as desired.The first point might introduce a lot of changes as we cannot assess a vectors zeroth element (hence all risks are shifted by one index). Consequently using the extractor function
risk.mboost()
might avoid to many changes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: