You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The ability to store the internal state of an object, as well as to initialize it with state is would be very useful, as this would eliminate the need to store the actual data point.
Currently the different classes cannot be extended by inheritance, since their internal state is private.
Anyway, since serialization and deserialization does not have any size/speed impact on the class, it is probably better to add this to the class and not to inherited version of it.
Probably good to use the boost serialization library, to assure that the output is portable (serialize on one machine and deserialize on another).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was also discussed here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32289719/how-to-serialize-boostaccumulatorsaccumulator-set
The ability to store the internal state of an object, as well as to initialize it with state is would be very useful, as this would eliminate the need to store the actual data point.
Currently the different classes cannot be extended by inheritance, since their internal state is private.
Anyway, since serialization and deserialization does not have any size/speed impact on the class, it is probably better to add this to the class and not to inherited version of it.
Probably good to use the boost serialization library, to assure that the output is portable (serialize on one machine and deserialize on another).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: