Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix assets missed crate root #339

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 4, 2024
Merged

Fix assets missed crate root #339

merged 2 commits into from
May 4, 2024

Conversation

boozook
Copy link
Owner

@boozook boozook commented May 4, 2024

Fixes #338, that happening in #319.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the cargo About cargo or cargo-playdate label May 4, 2024
support/build/src/assets/tests.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
support/build/src/assets/tests.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@boozook boozook force-pushed the fix-assets-missed-crate-root branch from 8129153 to 6d0b948 Compare May 4, 2024 13:48
@boozook
Copy link
Owner Author

boozook commented May 4, 2024

And of course the tests fall on the Windows paths.

support/build/src/assets/tests.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
support/build/src/assets/tests.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
support/build/src/assets/tests.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
support/build/src/assets/tests.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@boozook boozook force-pushed the fix-assets-missed-crate-root branch from 73bfcda to f02701c Compare May 4, 2024 20:25
@boozook boozook added bug Something isn't working assets Assets Build System build-utils labels May 4, 2024
@boozook boozook merged commit bc61d14 into main May 4, 2024
27 checks passed
@boozook boozook deleted the fix-assets-missed-crate-root branch May 4, 2024 21:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assets Assets Build System bug Something isn't working build-utils cargo About cargo or cargo-playdate
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Single file rule should be interpreted as "one to one", but not "many into one"
1 participant