Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Route53 health checks and health checked and failover records #1496

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

calind
Copy link

@calind calind commented May 15, 2013

xbe and others added 4 commits May 3, 2013 01:12
…ute53 healthchecked records

    * Includes commit '0e261dcb09398e6eab1e60fefd2f4f14c9526cf9' from @xbe fork
    * Adds support for creating/deleting healthchecks
check_dict = check_dict['HealthCheckConfig']
for key in check_dict:
if key == 'FullyQualifiedDomainName':
self.__setattr__('host', check_dict[key])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are these self.__setattr__(...) calls instead of setattr(self, ...) calls?

@toastdriven
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, patch looks alright. However, given how much this touches, we definitely need some tests to make sure we don't regress as mentioned in the contributing guide.

If you could write some tests, that would help a lot. Otherwise this will have to wait until a core dev can find some time to write tests for this.

Thanks again for the pull request.

@nonflet
Copy link

nonflet commented Sep 6, 2013

Hey, people, so how about health checks ?

@boyand
Copy link

boyand commented Nov 20, 2013

Any plans for this to get merged ?

@danielgtaylor
Copy link
Member

@boyand somebody needs to add tests to get this merged as mentioned above. At the moment the core developers are working on other issues.

@mattdeboard
Copy link
Contributor

@danielgtaylor This pull request was fixed by e49dc3c no?

For people finding this from Google (it's the top-ranked result for "boto route 53 healthcheck" for me), this functionality is supported in Boto already.

@danielgtaylor
Copy link
Member

Yes, sorry I forgot to close this issue. Please see #2054 and specifically e49dc3c for the final implementation. This should go out in the next release.

@leezen
Copy link

leezen commented Apr 8, 2014

Looking at #2054 I didn't see the support for the Failover tag included, which was part of #1496. Can that part of this pull get merged in as well? https://github.com/PressLabs/boto/commit/3281f01f032773f64e46a0e7d4730f4a86a68ff1 had this change as did 0e261dc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants