New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inclusive Gateways support #88
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
Hello! No, we do not plan to implement inclusive gateways, as a correct implementation cannot be determined. If you can, do not use inclusive gateways. See also |
Thanks a lot for the quick reply! |
I am tackling this today. |
barmac
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2022
barmac
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 18, 2022
barmac
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 18, 2022
bpmn-io-tasks
bot
added
needs review
Review pending
in progress
Currently worked on
and removed
in progress
Currently worked on
needs review
Review pending
labels
Feb 18, 2022
bpmn-io-tasks
bot
added
needs review
Review pending
and removed
backlog
Queued in backlog
labels
Nov 20, 2023
nikku
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
nikku
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2023
nikku
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2023
nikku
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2023
Awesome! 💯 |
Released with v0.32.0. Thanks @barmac 🍰 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello!
Is it planned to implement support for inclusive gateways?
Also reported via #122.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: