Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: allow async form providers #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023
Merged

feat: allow async form providers #4

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

marstamm
Copy link
Collaborator

@marstamm marstamm commented Nov 21, 2023

@marstamm marstamm requested a review from a team November 21, 2023 11:00
@marstamm marstamm self-assigned this Nov 21, 2023
@marstamm marstamm requested review from smbea and barmac and removed request for a team November 21, 2023 11:00
@bpmn-io-tasks bpmn-io-tasks bot added the needs review Review pending label Nov 21, 2023
@marstamm marstamm changed the title feat: allows async form providers feat: allow async form providers Nov 21, 2023
package.json Outdated
"bpmn-js": "^14.0.0"
"@bpmn-io/form-js": "^1.4.1",
"@bpmn-io/variable-resolver": "^1.2.0",
"bpmn-js": "^15.2.0"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to make form-js and bpmn-js peer dependencies here? I believe this is one of the places where this is granted.

In fact we don't want to use our own forms + bpmn-js, but resort on whatever is used as part of the stack, right?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, I'll change it

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

==> 7d56c04

I also marked variable-resolver as peer, since it does not make sense to have form resolving without variable completion

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great stuff.

@fake-join fake-join bot merged commit 1355dd8 into main Nov 27, 2023
6 checks passed
@fake-join fake-join bot deleted the allow-async-resolvers branch November 27, 2023 09:25
@bpmn-io-tasks bpmn-io-tasks bot removed the needs review Review pending label Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update bpmn-js to fix duplicate-packages issue in clients
2 participants