Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support ABP filter rule extensions #59

Closed
pes10k opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Support ABP filter rule extensions #59

pes10k opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request uBO-parity pending features that are already available in uBO

Comments

@pes10k
Copy link
Collaborator

pes10k commented Dec 6, 2019

Copied over from brave-experiments/ad-block#113

This would help squeeze out some more stuff out of the some of the filters that are already used and it would make it possible to implement even more filters in the future. The new syntax is an extension of ABP Filter Syntax and should (in theory) not be too hard to implement. More info on it can be found here: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Static-filter-syntax#extended-syntax

In general, there is some value in supporting ABP specific additions, more so on network rules but possibly on cosmetic rules too. Low priority but would be "nice to have"

@mtl1979
Copy link

mtl1979 commented May 8, 2022

Big companies like Meta now use minified CSS, so nothing except :-abp-has() works for blocking the ads. They also split texts like "Sponsored" character by character with <span> elements to make it really hard to use injected JavaScript code to block the ads.

Browser vendors and some operating system vendors are slowly moving towards aggressive blocking and blacklisting of sites that try to circumvent adblockers, so it makes sense to make support for cosmetic filters higher than low priority.

@pes10k
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pes10k commented May 8, 2022 via email

@antonok-edm antonok-edm added the uBO-parity pending features that are already available in uBO label May 16, 2024
@antonok-edm
Copy link
Collaborator

I think just about everything here is implemented already, closing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request uBO-parity pending features that are already available in uBO
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants