Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Crash Report #29402

Closed
benjamin238 opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Crash Report #29402

benjamin238 opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
closed/stale Issue is no longer relevant, perhaps because the feature it refers to has been deprecated. crash needs-more-info The report requires more detail before we can decide what to do with this issue. OS/Desktop priority/P2 A bad problem. We might uplift this to the next planned release.
Projects

Comments

@benjamin238
Copy link

IMPORTANT: Your crash has already been automatically reported to our crash system. Please file this bug only if you can provide more information about it.

Brave Version: 1.49.132 Chromium: 111.0.5563.147
Operating System: Windows NT 10.0.19045

URL (if applicable) where crash occurred: google.com, but happens with any website

Can you reproduce this crash? Yes

What steps will reproduce this crash? (If it's not reproducible, what were you doing just before the crash?)

  1. Open a private browsing tab
  2. Browse anything as normal in that tab
  3. Browser crashes at random. Opening a new tab within the private browsing window seems to trigger it the most.

chrome_debug.log

DO NOT CHANGE BELOW THIS LINE
Crash ID: crash/6ddb0000-0385-da09-0000-000000000000

@bsclifton bsclifton added crash needs-more-info The report requires more detail before we can decide what to do with this issue. labels Mar 30, 2023
@benjamin238
Copy link
Author

No, I have enough disk space and memory. I've tried restarting my PC with nothing open and I can still reproduce the problem.

@rebron rebron added this to To do in Crashes via automation Apr 6, 2023
@rebron rebron added OS/Desktop priority/P2 A bad problem. We might uplift this to the next planned release. labels Apr 6, 2023
@iefremov
Copy link
Contributor

The stack is apparently corrupted, @benjamin238 if it happens frequently can you please upload more crash reports and shared IDs?

[ 00 ] content::IndexedDBFactory::GetInMemoryDBSize(storage::BucketLocator const &) ( indexed_db_factory.cc:576 )
[ 01 ] base::Histogram::Factory::Build() ( histogram.cc:242 )
[ 02 ] static void * allocator_shim::internal::PartitionMalloc(const struct allocator_shim::AllocatorDispatch *, unsigned __int64, void *) ( allocator_shim_default_dispatch_to_partition_alloc.cc:303 )
[ 03 ] static void * allocator_shim::internal::PartitionMalloc(const struct allocator_shim::AllocatorDispatch *, unsigned __int64, void *) ( allocator_shim_default_dispatch_to_partition_alloc.cc:303 )
[ 04 ] static void * allocator_shim::internal::PartitionMalloc(const struct allocator_shim::AllocatorDispatch *, unsigned __int64, void *) ( allocator_shim_default_dispatch_to_partition_alloc.cc:303 )
[ 05 ] static void allocator_shim::internal::PartitionFree(const struct allocator_shim::AllocatorDispatch *, void *, void *) ( allocator_shim_default_dispatch_to_partition_alloc.cc:441 )
[ 06 ] static void * allocator_shim::internal::PartitionMalloc(const struct allocator_shim::AllocatorDispatch *, unsigned __int64, void *) ( allocator_shim_default_dispatch_to_partition_alloc.cc:303 )
[ 07 ] malloc ( allocator_shim_override_ucrt_symbols_win.h:71 )
[ 08 ] _tailMerge_esent.dll
[ 09 ] net::SchemefulSite::SchemefulSite(net::SchemefulSite const &) ( schemeful_site.cc:76 )
[ 10 ] static void allocator_shim::internal::PartitionFree(const struct allocator_shim::AllocatorDispatch *, void *, void *) ( allocator_shim_default_dispatch_to_partition_alloc.cc:441 )
[ 11 ] woff2::ComputeULongSum(unsigned char const *,unsigned __int64) ( woff2_common.cc:24 )
[ 12 ] static __int64 content::IndexedDBContextImpl::ReadUsageFromDisk(const struct storage::BucketLocator & const) ( indexed_db_context_impl.cc:1082 )
[ 13 ] _tailMerge_esent.dll
[ 14 ] content::IndexedDBContextImpl::QueryDiskAndUpdateQuotaUsage(storage::BucketLocator const &) ( indexed_db_context_impl.cc:1102 )
[ 15 ] operator new(unsigned __int64) ( new_scalar.cpp:35 )
[ 16 ] struct std::Cr::pair<std::Cr::__tree_iterator<storage::BucketLocator,std::Cr::__tree_node<storage::BucketLocator,void *> *,long long>,bool> std::Cr::__tree<storage::BucketLocator,std::Cr::less<storage::BucketLocator>,std::Cr::allocator<storage::BucketLocator> >::__emplace_unique_key_args<storage::BucketLocator,const storage::BucketLocator &>(const struct storage::BucketLocator & const, const struct storage::BucketLocator & const) ( __tree:2114 )
[ 17 ] content::IndexedDBContextImpl::FactoryOpened(storage::BucketLocator const &) ( indexed_db_context_impl.cc:932 )
[ 18 ] static struct std::Cr::pair<std::Cr::__wrap_iter<std::Cr::pair<base::IdType<storage::BucketTag,long long,0,1>,std::Cr::unique_ptr<content::IndexedDBBucketState,std::Cr::default_delete<content::IndexedDBBucketState> > > *>,bool> base::internal::flat_tree<base::IdType<storage::BucketTag,long long,0,1>,base::internal::GetFirst,std::Cr::less<void>,std::Cr::vector<std::Cr::pair<base::IdType<storage::BucketTag,long long,0,1>,std::Cr::unique_ptr<content::IndexedDBBucketState,std::Cr::default_delete<content::IndexedDBBucketState> > >,std::Cr::allocator<std::Cr::pair<base::IdType<storage::BucketTag,long long,0,1>,std::Cr::unique_ptr<content::IndexedDBBucketState,std::Cr::default_delete<content::IndexedDBBucketState> > > > > >::emplace<const base::IdType<storage::BucketTag,long long,0,1> &,std::Cr::unique_ptr<content::IndexedDBBucketState,std::Cr::default_delete<content::IndexedDBBucketState> > >(const class base::IdType<storage::BucketTag,long long,0,1> & const, class std::Cr::unique_ptr<content::IndexedDBBucketState,std::Cr::default_delete<content::IndexedDBBucketState> > *) ( flat_tree.h:867 )
[ 19 ] content::IndexedDBFactory::GetOrOpenBucketFactory(storage::BucketLocator const &,base::FilePath const &,bool) ( indexed_db_factory.cc:785 )
[ 20 ] _tailMerge_esent.dll
[ 21 ] _tailMerge_esent.dll
[ 22 ] _tailMerge_esent.dll

@iefremov
Copy link
Contributor

stale

Crashes automation moved this from To do to Done May 14, 2024
@iefremov iefremov added the closed/stale Issue is no longer relevant, perhaps because the feature it refers to has been deprecated. label May 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed/stale Issue is no longer relevant, perhaps because the feature it refers to has been deprecated. crash needs-more-info The report requires more detail before we can decide what to do with this issue. OS/Desktop priority/P2 A bad problem. We might uplift this to the next planned release.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants