Oauth into Asana leaves a blank window open.

[alexwykoff]

Description

When logging into Asana, it allows for a user to use Oauth & their Google account.
After the handshake is complete, the new, smaller Oauth window is left open and is blank.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Log into Google
2. Log into Asana with Google

Actual result:

Expected result:
Since the handshake is complete, the window should close.

Reproduces how often: [What percentage of the time does it reproduce?]
100%

Brave Version

about:brave info:

Brave: 0.19.9
rev: 2a9a56f
Muon: 4.4.19
libchromiumcontent: 61.0.3163.79
V8: 6.1.534.32
Node.js: 7.9.0
Update Channel: Beta
OS Platform: macOS
OS Release: 16.7.0
OS Architecture: x64

Reproducible on current live release:
Unsure, needs investigation.

Additional Information

[jamesray1]

Yes I get the same result (a blank small window after clicking to sign in with Google) for OAuth with Google on about.me.
Twitter OAuth works, but Facebook and Google doesn't.

Brave: 0.18.29
rev: 85f059d
Muon: 4.3.16
libchromiumcontent: 60.0.3112.113
V8: 6.0.286.56
Node.js: 7.9.0
Update Channel: dev
OS Platform: Linux
OS Release: 4.10.0-33-generic
OS Architecture: x64

[luixxiul]

me too. I noticed that when I logged in with Facebook.

[eduardonunesp]

Hummm interesting maybe something related to the window.close(), after the handshake completed some window.close() should be called. Maybe some reference to the window.opener isn't passed to the new window.

[bsclifton]

I believe this is related to window.close not working as expected

cc: @jonathansampson @kevinlawler

[jonathansampson]

I was able to repro fairly easily.

I don't think this is an issue with window.close necessarily. Note that the tab is closed, but the popup window doesn't know that all tabs are closed. As such, the window stays open.

[jrmoreau]

Any update on this? Experiencing the same. Also experiencing after I confirm a tx on MEW with Trezor

[bsclifton]

Closing as a duplicate of #13370

[jamesray1]

Technically, this happened first, so #13370 would be a duplicate.

[bsclifton]

The original issue was #9610 which was closed in favor of #13370 since it had more detail 😄 More detail in an issue is more important than a lower issue number