Fix multiple filenames in ARGV in tac with a test.

[shlomif]

There was a mix of sysseek and tell.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 73

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 91.667%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 69:	0.1%
Covered Lines:	66
Relevant Lines:	72

---

💛 - Coveralls

[briandfoy]

The license needs to match the entire project.

[briandfoy]

You need to license everything in the same way that the entire package is licenses. In this case, it's exactly the Artistic License 2.0 (as seen in LICENSE). It can't be a future license that does not exist.

[shlomif]

hi @briandfoy ! I hope you don't take it the wrong way but you seem a little too pedantic and stubborn and bikeshedding here - see http://shlomifishswiki.branchable.com/Never_Try_to_Please_Everyone/ . While IANAL but it is not inconceivable that one day there will be The Artistic License 2.1 or 3.0 or whatever. You can be a bit more tolerant. Hakuna matata .

[briandfoy]

Okay. I’ll close this issue. Since you decided to make personal attacks, I won’t accept any further contributions from you.