-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 457
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
speed-up x1.25 is really - need symmetry when calculating batch inversion #188
Comments
@Telariust From where we can get VanitySearch v1.15.2 ? :D |
Hi,
You can download it from the GitHub link.
http://github.com/JeanLucPons/VanitySearch
FYI, It supports only cuda devices. Doesn't work with opencl devices like
AMD gpus.
Releases section.
Regards,
…On Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 1:27 PM su314ka ***@***.***> wrote:
@Telariust <https://github.com/Telariust> From where we can get
VanitySearch v1.15.2 ? :D
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#188?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA5MDIJHPW6VTYJARR6EVVLQDUPM3A5CNFSM4IKOUCF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD355NEQ#issuecomment-519820946>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA5MDIJC2MDSM5UZHJKQBKDQDUPM3ANCNFSM4IKOUCFQ>
.
|
@sponnusa That is official version v.1.15 not v.1.15.2 |
Telariust
changed the title
speed-up x1.7 is really - need symmetry when calculating batch inversion
speed-up x1.25 is really - need symmetry when calculating batch inversion
Aug 19, 2019
try -b 22 |
how did you calculate the range for the kangaroo 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000A00000000 for this address 1CABDYTie48wXV93XJ4Bdk7MFSTyshTXxg or is it a search range for all addresses? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, dev brichard19!
Take a look at this program.
github.com/JeanLucPons/VanitySearch
It also computes the keys sequentially, but uses symmetry to calculate batch inversion.
After fix code (turned off unallowable symmetry of Y and endomorphism), I was convinced that it works +%25 faster than BitCrack.
You can really speed up your creation, just do the calculation of the pack from the center to the edges.
test calc
RANGE: 0xF00000000 - 0xA00000000 = 0x500000000 (21,474,836,480)
[VanitySearch ver1.15.2, add BitCrack mode, startPrivKey from seed arg]
RUNTIME: 22:56:48 - 22:54:43 = 00:02:05 (125sec)
post updated, retest , bad small arg -p 64, -p 1024 more optimal, iam sry
[BitCrack v0.30]
RUNTIME: 8:35:14 - 8:32:46 = 00:02:28 (148sec)
COMPARE
if runtime right:
148s / 125s = x1,18
if hashrate right:
195MK/s / 152Mk/s = x1,28
source and binary attached
VanitySearch-1.15.4_bitcrack
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: