Support new execute command

[Joelant05]

Available as of 1.19.10.20

[Joelant05]

In order to support this, we need some way of supporting recursive command arguments, e.g. chain of as, at, unless and run in execute as @a at @s unless block ~ ~1 ~ air 0 run say there is a block above my head
Is this something you could look into when you get the time @solvedDev? I'll let you know if I think of a nice way of supporting this

[solvedDev]

I've been thinking about how to implement the new /execute as well. Maybe we can add the subcommands as normal commands and then have a new "requiredCommandPrefix" property?

[Joelant05]

How exactly would this work? I understand we could introduce as, at etc as individual commands with "requiredCommandPrefix": "execute" but what about when it comes to nesting these. We won't know what the prefix will be as it could be a selector for example, so how could we use "requiredCommandPrefix" then? Unless I have understood this wrong

[solvedDev]

“requireCommandPrefix” would look at the last command that was used, not the last argument the user typed.
Maybe something like this would work better:

{
  “requires”: {
    “commandBefore”: “execute”
  }
}

[Joelant05]

oh I see, but how would this let us choose when to begin the chain within the command?
e.g. execute positioned as @p ... how would it know when to propose the chain after @p specifically

[solvedDev]

An alternative would be to add a dedicate system for subcommands...

{
  "commands": [
    {
      "commandName": "execute",
      "arguments": [
	{
	  "type": "subcommand",
          "allowMultiple": true
	}, 
        {
          "additionalData": {
	    "values": ["run"]
	  }
        },
        {
          "argumentName": "command",
          "type": "command"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "subcommands": [
    {
      "commandName": "execute",
      "commands": [{...}]
    }
  ]
}

[solvedDev]

oh I see, but how would this let us choose when to begin the chain within the command? e.g. execute positioned as @p ... how would it know when to propose the chain after @p specifically

I think this won't be a big problem but I believe my latest proposal probably still makes more sense

[Joelant05]

An alternative would be to add a dedicate system for subcommands...

I like this format 👍

[Joelant05]

bridge-core/editor-packages@1728c36

[solvedDev]

6e372b0